The Oral Argument for this case will be heard
in the Alaska Supreme Court in
Fairbanks on March 13, 1998 at 11:15AM


This brief can be accessed through its Table of Contents
or downloaded as a Word for Windows document(while pressing the "Shift" key click here).


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA

Wolfgang Falke, )
)
Appellant, )
)

vs.

)

)
City of Fairbanks Council, et al, )

) Supreme Court Case NO. S-08021

Appellee.

)

) Trial Court Case # 4FA-96-02423CI

 

APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT

OF THE STATE OF ALASKA, FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NIESJE J. STEINKRUGER, JUDGE

BRIEF OF APPELLANTS

 

__________________
Wolfgang Falke,
Appellant,
918 Seventh Avenue,
Fairbanks, Ak. 99701

Filed in the Supreme Court
of the State of Alaska the
_______ day of July, 1997.

By: ____________________

(Deputy Clerk)


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Table of Cases and Authorities . . . . . . . . . . . . ii

Books . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii

Court Rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv

Constitutional Provisions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vi

Home Rule Charter for the City of Fairbanks, Alaska . . . . vi

Alaska Statutes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii

JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT . . . . . . . . . . 1

List of all parties to the case: . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

STATEMENT OF ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW . . . 2

STATEMENT OF CASE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 I. BACKGROUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
  1. Nature of Case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
  2. Procedural History . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
  3. The Superior Court’s Rulings . . . . . . . . 10
II. STATEMENT OF RELEVANT FACTS . . . . . . 11
  1. 1. Undisputed Facts . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
  2. Disputed Facts, or Genuine Issues of Material Fact 14

STANDARD OF REVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

A R G U M E N T . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

I. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN HOLDING THAT
THE PLAINTIFFS HAVE NO RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL
AND BY DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR A
TRIAL BY JURY AND THE TRIAL COURT EXCEEDED
ITS JURISDICTION WHEN IT ATTEMPTED TO
DETERMINE THE FACTS WITHOUT A JURY. . . 17

II. IT WAS ERROR FOR THE TRIAL COURT TO GRANT
MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND
TO TREAT SAID MOTION AS A MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT BECAUSE THERE REMAINED
GENUINE ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT AND THE
PLAINTIFF PROPERLY REQUESTED A TRIAL BY JURY
AS A MATTER OF RIGHT, THUS, THE TRIAL COURT
LACKED JURISDICITON AS TRIER OF FACTS. . . 20

III. CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

 

 

Wolfgang Falke v.
City of Fairbanks Council, et al,