The Influence of Close-Range Pollution on Maine's Air Quality During The Peak Ozone Episodes in 1997

 

Cliff Michaelsen, Cathy Richardson, Marylee Mullen,

Paul Nichols and Andrew Johnson

The State of Maine Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Air Quality

(WORKING DRAFT 4)

 

 

Abstract

 

During the 1997 ozone smog season, ambient data was collected at three PAMS (Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Station) sites and fifteen ozone monitoring sites within Maine. One of the ozone monitors was located on the Scotia Prince, a passenger ferry that traveled daily between Yarmouth, Nova Scotia and Portland, Maine.

 

Assessment of the PAMS data, collected during times when Maine's ozone monitoring sites recorded exceedences of the federal ozone standard (0.124 ppm), indicated that ozone levels in Maine are elevated by short-range, anthropogenic (human-made) precursor emissions. Analysis of benzene/toluene, NMOC/NOx, NMOC/NOy ratios, MIR's (Maximum Incremental Reactivity) and other hydrocarbon relationships demonstrates that ozone precursor emissions are transported into and generated within the State of Maine.

 

Mobile sources are important contributors to these emissions.

 

Introduction

The study of transported pollution into and throughout the Northeast is not a new undertaking. To Maine's benefit, a tremendous amount of new information over the last few years has enlightened scientists to more fully appreciate the complex meteorological processes that influence pollution transport at a coastal interface. Over the past several years, the Bureau of Air Quality has dedicated significant resources to quantify the extent and significance of pollution transported into Maine, and the significance of pollution generated within the state. Ongoing analysis of pollution during the last several years indicates that human-made pollution made within short distance of air samplers do have a negative influence on the air quality within the state of Maine.

 

While it is widely recognized that good science should be the driving force behind good policy, air pollution control administrators have often been forced to make environmental decisions based on political and economic pressures rather than on science alone. Such has been the case in Maine where policymakers have been forced to decide what strategies to employ for reducing air pollution, amid scientific uncertainty and strong public opposition. The findings detailed here provide insight as to which human-made compounds contribute most to the formation of ground-level ozone, and will be useful in making future policy determinations.

 

This paper and its conclusions are derived from data collected within Maine during the summer of 1997. This ozone season saw three days in Maine that exceeded the federal ambient air quality standard of 0.124 ppm. This paper is a detailed analysis of the meteorological and chemical processes that were responsible for the elevated smog levels within the state on June 21st, June 30th-July 1st of 1997.

 

Ozone smog is a secondary pollutant, meaning that It is not created by one process, but rather through a series of complex atmospheric and chemical reactions. Ozone has both natural and human-made (anthropogenic) sources in the lower levels of the atmosphere. The primary natural source of ozone near the earth's surface is direct injection from the stratosphere. In addition, ozone is photochemically (with the direct interaction from sunlight) produced in the troposphere from ozone precursors. Precursors are the raw chemical ingredients that react to generate ozone. They are the oxides of nitrogen (NOx), and volatile organic compounds (VOC's). At elevated levels ozone is known to damage human lungs and vegetation. It also plays a role in fashioning climate change. Because of its role in tropospheric photochemistry, ozone can modify global climate by influencing the concentrations of chemically active "greenhouse" gases such as methane.

 

Since 1993, the Bureau of Air Quality has been involved in continuous ambient hydrocarbon (VOC) monitoring at Two Lights State Park in Cape Elizabeth, Maine, southeast of Portland, Maine. These hydrocarbon measurements have been used in international field studies focusing on ozone smog production in the North Atlantic, and have provided the basis for deploying two other gas chromatographs along the coast of Maine. The data collected at these locations, in conjunction with Maine's 15 ozone monitors, has recently provided analysts a much clearer picture of the significance of local and regional ozone precursor pollution. The sampling and analysis procedures followed were those of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations Program.

 

Throughout the course of this paper, the reader should be familiar with the following acronyms: CETL (Cape Elizabeth Two Lights monitor), BHCM (Bar Harbor Cadillac Mountain monitor), BHMF (Bar Harbor McFarland Hill monitor) and KFS (Kittery Frisbee Street monitor). Surface temperatures will be noted in degrees Fahrenheit, while temperatures aloft will be frequently noted in degrees Celsius. The two layers aloft (850 mb and 500 mb's) are two pressure levels that can best describe the mechanics of what is happening in the atmosphere above the surface. The 850 mb chart details weather conditions at the 850 mb level or around 5000 feet above sea level. The 500 mb level is often referred to as the steering level. Most weather systems and precipitation follow the winds at this height. This level averages around 18,000 feet above sea level and is roughly half-way up through the weather producing part of the atmosphere called the troposphere. NOAA stands for the National Oceanic and Aviation Administration.

 

Techniques Used in the Analysis

 

Sources of Monitored Data:

 

Some of the most vital information in this study was generated by three continuous air sampling monitors, gas chromatographs (or GC's). The State of Maine Department of Environmental Protection, (DEP) and the State of New Hampshire are required to analyze the impacts of upwind pollution from Boston, Mass., and Portsmouth, New Hampshire and other metropolitan areas at three GC's located within the state of Maine. The first site is located in Kittery (KFS), the second in Cape Elizabeth (CETL), and the third is located on Cadillac Mountain in Acadia National Park (BHCM).

 

These GC's draw in outside (ambient) air continuously for forty minutes each hour, and identify what types of volatile organic compounds (hydrocarbons) are present in the atmosphere. For the most part, these instruments sample human-made VOC's, although they also measure biogenic (natural) compounds. The data generated by the GC's can also be used to ascertain the relative age of the reactive hydrocarbons, and their potential to generate ozone pollution.

 

Besides VOC's, the other critical ingredient required to form ozone smog includes the oxides of nitrogen. Here is a brief description of the role of nitrogen during ozone production: Nitric oxide (NO) is rapidly converted in the atmosphere by the existing ozone (O3) into nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and oxygen (O2). In the presence of sunlight, NO2 is photo-dissociated back into NO and atomic oxygen (O). Lastly, the remaining oxygen molecule re-combines with O2 to form O3, with a third molecule acting as a stabilizer to take away excess energy. As is the case with hydrocarbons, members of the nitrogen family have both human-made and natural origins. NO and NOx are routinely measured at the Kittery (KFS) and Cadillac Mt. Sites (BHCM), while Cape Elizabeth (CETL) monitors NO and NOy. NOy, or "odd nitrogen" is the sum of NOx in addition to all oxidized nitrogen species that are sinks of NOx through processes that occur on short time scales.

 

During 1997, fifteen ozone monitors continuously recorded hourly averaged ozone readings throughout Maine. Historically, coastal ozone monitors have recorded the highest ozone smog concentrations within the state of Maine, and that was also observed during the 1997 season. The highest smog readings monitored in 1997 throughout Maine were recorded during the June 30th-July 1st episode.

 

The Scotia Prince is a commercial passenger ship that traverses the Atlantic waters between Portland, ME and Yarmouth, NS. The vessel makes the voyage twice daily, and allows researchers (for the first time), the opportunity to document the phenomena of multiple plumes of ozone pollution in the marine environment.

 

Meteorology:

 

Back trajectories (looking at the origins of where the air parcel had been over the course of 24 hours prior to 00 UTC) for each of the episode days were calculated "on-line" at NOAA's web site: http://140.90.134.12/ready.html. The HYSPLIT computer program was used to generate the past movement of the air parcels. HYSPLIT end trajectories were calculated for 300,100 and 10 meter heights above sea level at CETL and KFS, while the corresponding heights of 221m and 467m represent the actual heights of the monitors at McFarland Hill and Cadillac Mountain in Acadia National Park respectively.

 

Daily synoptic weather features (surface analysis and infrared satellite photos) at both 12Z and 0Z were obtained by accessing the Purdue Weather Archive network on the web. Winds aloft and 850 mb temperatures were extrapolated using files generated from the NOAA's ETA model.

 

 

Assessment Techniques:

 

Ratios between known compounds (such as Benzene/Toluene); and their relative reactivities have been effective in determining the "freshness" or "age" of an air parcel. Age means that more reactive organic compounds have undergone photochemical reactions and have chemically changed. It is a way to determine whether or not the pollution captured is old, transported air, or is newly generated (and more than likely attributable to nearby sources).

 

Ozone precursor emission control strategies have been developed based on an assessment of whether or not an area is "VOC-limited" or "NOx-limited". Simply put, under VOC-limited conditions, additions of VOC's to the air results in increased ozone concentrations. Adding additional NOx to NOx-limited areas results in increased ozone concentrations. When a calculation indicates that an airshed is lacking VOC's (or VOC-limited), and ozone concentrations continue to rise, that means that additional VOC's (as well as previously "cooked" O3) did arrive at the monitor, and it is reasonable to assume that those fresh VOC's may have been the leading contributor to the formation of additional ozone. Each VOC reacts at a different rate, and with different reaction mechanisms. Therefore, VOC's can differ significantly in their influence on ozone formation. Assessing the reactivity, or ozone formation potential (MIR values), of VOC's is important. MIR values can be useful in determining whether human-made or biogenic compounds were responsible for increased ozone production.

 

Morning NMOC/NOy, NMOC/NOx ratios have been used to indicate if the precursors to ozone formation are Nox-limited or VOC-limited. There are two time periods that seem to establish the ozone formation limitations of an air parcel in Maine. The first time period, between the hours of 5 AM and 9 AM, represents the time of day when ozone production has "reset itself" to reflect lowest reading of the day. Also, at this time of day there is little or no discernable influence of vertical mixing (the transporting of ozone and its precursors from higher elevations back down to the surface after the sun's rays break up the morning inversion), and there is less dilution potential. Ozone precursors that are emitted early in the day provide the raw ingredients for photochemistry. The second important time for determining the limitations of an air parcel's ability to create ozone is just before the event occurs. One caveat must be noted at this time. NOy is an indicator of reacted NOx. A NMOC/NOy ratio in the morning may not be as useful for the purpose of determining whether an ozone event is NOx limitation.

 

A detailed account of the ozone exceedance day summary for Maine can be viewed at the end of the document.

 

Discussion of the Federal Exceedances

 

June 21, 1997

 

The Ozone Event:

Clear diurnal cycles of elevated ozone on the 21st and 22nd of June, 1997 are presented in figure 1. Highest concentrations occurred between 1500 and 1700. Early morning ozone readings near the state health advisory level (0.081 ppm) were recorded at the top of Cadillac Mountain. The elevated ozone is indicative of transported long-range, overnight pollution from the previous day. The peak ozone concentration recorded at BHCM was 0.126 at 1700. Overall, ozone concentrations at the Maine monitors tailed off significantly moving inland from the coast.

 

Figure 2 displays the contoured, daily maximum ozone concentrations mapped with the Ozone Mapping System. The alignment of the maximum concentrations along coastal locations is consistent with the current evidence for transported pollution from the Boston corridor. Subsequent plots of the ozone data collected by the Scotia Prince also indicates transported pollution along the coast.

 

Meteorology:

The meteorological surface features present at 0Z on the 22nd (the evening of the 21st) included a warm front draped along the eastern fringe of Maine, and a cold front stretched from the St. Lawrence to western New York, as seen in figure 3.

 

Warm temperatures at 850 mb's (near 15 C at Portland and 16C at Presque Isle, Maine), figure 4, blanketed the state. Daily maximum temperatures rose into the 80's at most locations across the state, and by 0Z, thunderstorms were scattered throughout Maine. Aloft at 500 mb's, a typical flat, strong zonal summer flow was established across the northern half of the US, as seen in figure 5. Air parcel stagnation was evident at lower and upper levels of the atmosphere in the mid-Atlantic region. Photochemistry was substantially enhanced by these weather conditions, which caused a classic south to north transport episode from upwind New England. The high resolution satellite photo during this time period, figure 6, shows the significant clear-air over southern New England, as well as the convective thunderstorms that boiled up in northern Maine during the late afternoon and evening (closer to the warm front). Weather-wise, the two previous days were good set-up days, as a sizable amount of warm air and associated pollution from the southern portion of the Ozone Transport Region (OTR) moved up the East Coast under a large, slow moving high pressure ridge. Data for this analysis was provided by NOAA and Purdue University.

 

Back Trajectories:

The 24-hour back trajectories from CETL and BHCM are very similar in directionality (@ 210 degrees) for the duration of the parcel movement. The air masses arriving at the sites have a slightly more westerly component aloft than at the surface. During the 24 hours prior to their arrival in Maine, the air parcels moved from New Jersey, continued on a path over Boston, and traveled along the coast before being measured at the chromatographs in Maine. The KFS trajectory is shorter in length, and demonstrates more of a westerly path over Harrisburg PA, Kingston, NY, and Springfield, MA. The trajectory calculations for this exercise were generated with NOAA's HYSPLIT model currently available to users on the internet. Levels chosen for CETL and KFS were at 300m, 100m and 10m's. The two trajectories generated for Cadillac Mountain originated the actual elevations of at Bar Harbor, McFarland Hill, and the top of Cadillac Mountain (221 meters BHMH / 467 meters BHCM). See figures 7, 8, and 9.

 

 

Analysis of Hydrocarbon Data:

Several assessment techniques can be used to determine whether or not additional VOC's or additional NOx were enhanced ozone formation. On the whole, O3/Noy and O3-40/NOy ratios seem to indicate that an air mass is more inclined to be more NOx limited. The latest school of thought by atmospheric chemists on determining the appropriate limitation of an air parcel tends to lean toward NMOC/NOx and NMOC/NOy ratios as the best indicators.

 

During June 21-22, 1997, the data collected from the KFS monitor indicates that the air was VOC-limited to transitional. "Transitional" refers to a state that is between NOx and VOC-limited. CETL data also exhibited a similar pattern (with slightly higher transitional indicators). Ambient air measured at BHCM on the 21st appears NOx-limited, then becomes a transitional limited regime until the end of the event on the 22nd, figure 10.

 

Generally, the Kittery data, KFS measures higher concentrations of total TNMOC hydrocarbons than either CETL or BHCM, figure 11. This is evident on the 21st of June. Benzene, toluene, m/p xylene and ethylene levels are greater than both CETL and BHCM on June 21st. Although these compounds are found in many combustion processes, they are predominately associated with fresh emissions from motor vehicles (by-products of the burning of gasoline), see figures 12, 13, 14, and 15.

 

The ratios between benzene and toluene have been useful to atmospheric chemists in determining the freshness or age of an air parcel. Figure 16 shows that for the duration of 6/21/97 through 6/22/97, the hydrocarbons collected at the KFS monitor are clearly fresh, compared with slightly more aged air of CETL and BHCM. During the end of the event, air masses arriving at BHCM are significantly older than those seen at CETL.

 

Recorded benzene/toluene ratios were higher in the southern part of the state than the northeastern part of the state. Coincidentally, the hydrocarbons sampled by EPA at high traffic areas around the Boston area this summer, showed fresh benzene/toluene ratios in the same range of 0.4, figure 17. Also, the automobile emission signature of the BTEX compounds is very prominent.

Figures 18, 19 and 20 reveal the combined ozone concentration with the segregated hydrocarbons that drove the chemical reactions (MIR's). Both KFS and CETL were classified as VOC-limited to transitional. The MIR values derived from the hydrocarbon data demonstrate that even though isoprene values at KFS were high, the total reactivity of isoprene was not as great as the reactivity of other anthropogenic hydrocarbons species collected. Only for a brief time, after peak ozone concentrations were measured, did the reactivity of the biogenic VOC's collected exceed the reactivity of the anthropogenic hydrocarbons. Some of the compounds in the greatest abundance at KFS are: 1,2,3-trimethylbenzene, toluene, benzene, m/p-xylene, and ethylene. MIR values at CETL and BHCM are heavily dominated by anthropogenic HC's indicating the significant influence of human-made emissions on the production of ozone later in the day. Remember that the emissions at KFS and CETL are considered to be fresh.

 

Ozone Monitoring Offshore Onboard the Scotia Prince:

The time series plots of ozone readings measured on Scotia Prince leaving Yarmouth, NS early on the 21st show that the ship encountered a gradual rise in ozone concentrations during her entire trip to the coast of Maine, figure 21. The maximum value recorded by the ship was 0.108 ppm, two hours before she entered port. The alignment and configuration of this plume is consistent with the time and concentrations registered at Phippsburg, ME. The location of Yarmouth, NS is on the right of the chart and Portland, Maine would be on the left. One should read the chart from right to left on the charts labeled Yarmouth to Portland, and left to right on the charts labeled Portland to Yarmouth. The times registered on the bottom have been corrected to accommodate the difference between DST and EST. All measurements are corrected and recorded in EST.

 

During the return trip to Yarmouth, NS starting at 2000 on the 21st, figure 22, ozone concentrations were consistently elevated above 0.080 ppm for the duration of the trip.

 

 

June 22, 1997

 

By 0Z on the 23rd, the cold front that had been hanging to the west on the previous day had slipped offshore, figures 23 and 24. Another trof located on the western border of Maine moving west to east during the early afternoon distributed showers late at night that scrubbed out any remaining precursors and ozone. Aloft, a substantial trof was present on the West Coast of the US, a small ridge in the central states, and some slight digging at 500 mb was evident, figure 25. 850 mb temperatures in Portland at 0Z climbed to 18 C, and winds aloft after the frontal passage shifted back to the NW, figure 26. Highest ozone readings occurred during the early afternoon, @ 1200 to 1500 (pre-frontal), figure 27. 0Z trajectories reflect the progression of the front earlier in the day, and are not necessarily indicative of where the dirty air parcels came from, figures 28, 29 and 30.

 

The hydrocarbon analysis for the 22nd was discussed in adequate detail in the previous section.

 

 

June 29th thru July 1st, 1997

 

The Ozone Event:

Ozone concentrations for three days exceeded the State Health Advisory Level (of 0.080 ppm) on June 29th, 30th, and July 1st of 1997. Maximum ozone concentrations during this three day event exceeded the Federal Standard of 0.124 ppm on the 30th of June. The ozone monitors at Cape Elizabeth and Kennebunkport recorded the highest values within Maine for several years at 0.154 ppm. High readings were also reported at Phippsburg, Port Clyde, Kittery and onboard the Scotia Prince. Figures 31, 32 and 33 present the contouring of ozone concentrations for the three day episode of June 29th thru July 1st. Figure 34 displays the hourly ozone concentrations at all of the monitors in Maine during the event with the exception of the Scotia Prince data (presented in subsequent graphics).

 

Meteorology:

On June 30th, a significant high pressure system aloft was positioned off the Virginia coast, figure 35. High pressure at the surface, extending from Maine to North Carolina, allowed for substantial photochemistry of the atmosphere, figure 36. 0Z temps were still in the 80's across southern Maine. This high pressure ridge had promoted a substantial warm-up across the eastern half of the USA. Figure 37 indicates that temperatures at 850 mb had reached 16 degrees C in Maine. From space, cloudless skies were visible over New England, figure 38. This weather pattern was firmly in place until second of July, when clouds and scattered showers entered from the west. An approaching cold front from the north joined with a western trof, and precipitation resulted, figure 39. On all three days, light surface winds were observed.

 

The age of the air masses at CETL and BHCM, correlates well with the known timing of the arrival of the Boston plume. Alignment of the 24-hr back trajectory is over the OTR corridor to the SW. A progression in time of the monitors exceeding the standard is representative of an extending plume from the south, (once again visible in the Scotia Prince data). Surface winds taken at CETL display a W/SW wind on the 30th, gradually changing to the NW by the start of the day on the 1st.

 

Back Trajectories:

The 24-hour back trajectories at all three sites on the 30th of June demonstrate that the immediate transport was not up the New York City to Boston corridor, but more indicative of larger-scale (slow moving) transport around the high to the south, figures 40, 41 and 42. The HYSPLIT trajectories move the air parcel from an origin in Vermont, through southern New Hampshire and southern Maine, then merge it with the marine air during the previous 24 hours that led to the exceedances in Maine on the 30th. Back Trajectories ending at 0Z on July 2, 1997, figures 43,44 and 45, show the progression of the air parcels over the metropolitan cities upwind of Maine.

 

Analysis of Hydrocarbon Data:

It must be noted that the chromatographs at CETL and BHCM had technical malfunctions from midnight on the 30th up to 9:AM on the 1st of July. Data from KFS remained online with one exception. From 11 AM to 1 PM on June 30th, site operators at KFS were conducting calibration checks, hence that gap in information. As indicated in figure 46, TNMOC/NOy and TNMOC/NOx values from 0Z on the 29th up until midnight were in a transitional range. Values at KFS overnight on the 29th continued to drop into the VOC-limited regime. CETL and BHCM values showed similar trends.

 

During 6/28 to 7/1, the air mass at KFS largely displayed VOC-limited to transitional characteristics. The exception to this was between 1300 to 1500 on the 1st of July when an abundance of anthropogenic hydrocarbons measured at the site inverted the chemistry from a VOC-limited environment to that of a Nox-limited one.

 

What is visible in figures 46 and 47 is that all three sites demonstrated an ability to be VOC-limited to transitional at times before and during the peak ozone hours.

 

Figure 48 graphs the relative age of the air parcels. Once again, equipment failure at CETL and BHCM does not allow for a complete analysis of the entire event, but what is available demonstrates that the monitor at KFS is impacted by fresh or very fresh human-made emissions. Farther down the coast at CETL, the age of the air parcels can be categorized as aged to fresh, while benzene/toluene ratios at BHCM demonstrate that the compounds driving the reactions at that remote site are rather aged. When the comparison of m/p xylene to benzene ratios are calculated for the same time period, as in figure 49, the same results are seen.

 

Figure 50 displays the comparison of NOy and NOx values for the three locations from June 28th thru July 1st, 1997. Significantly higher NOx values were reported at KFS during the three day event.

 

When one looks at the analysis of the BTEX compounds (associated largely as a byproduct of automobile exhaust), figures 51, 52, 53 and 54, it is quite evident that the greatest quantity all of these compounds were recorded at KFS, with lower values detected at CETL and BHCM. As an indicator of the biogenic VOC activity, isoprene levels at KFS, on the whole, were greater than either CETL or BHCM, figure 55.

 

Figures 56, 57 and 58 show the reactivity of the HC's measured at KFS, CETL and BHCM. Anthropogenic hydrocarbons dominated the samples, and even in that period early in the afternoon on July 1st, when the isoprene levels at BHCM were greater than the anthropogenic emissions, ozone values atop Cadillac Mt. did not exceed the federal ozone standard.

 

Ozone Monitoring Offshore Onboard the Scotia Prince:

Ozone values near 0.080 ppm were recorded at Yarmouth, Nova Scotia near the time of the ship's departure, and gradually rose to values very close to the federal ozone smog standard (0.124 ppm) by the time she entered Portland, Harbor, figure 59. Figure 60 depicts a "classic offshore plume" that is retaining its shape in the stable marine environment just one hour after the vessel left Portland. During the next day's voyage on the 1st of July starting off from Yarmouth, one can see that, figure 61, the main plume has migrated slightly eastward, and concentrations have dropped by about 0.030 ppm. Either the main plume has been divided by some offshore wind mechanism, or a secondary finger of pollution has arrived closer to the coastline On the last trip of the day on July 1st leaving from Portland, figure 62, a large cloud of ozone is visible hugging the Maine coast. The coastal sea breeze enhances elevated ozone levels into the evening hours at the monitors along Maine's shoreline, (Ray and Michaelsen 1995).

 

Conclusions

 

These analyses do not attempt to create a complete picture of Nox- vs. VOC-limitations in Southern Maine; they merely act as a tool to better quantify human-made compounds that contribute to poor air quality recorded during the summer months within Maine.

 

The 1997 Maine data illustrates that all of the fresh, short-range transported anthropogenic emissions within 150 miles of the receptors in Maine negatively impacted the air quality within Maine. Support for this conclusion comes from the executive summary from the Ozone Transport Assessment Group (OTAG), (OTAG 1995) which concluded that the most substantial affects on an areas' inability to attain the federal ozone standard lies within the short range transport range of 30-150 miles. OTAG's claim is substantiated by findings here in, which indicate that anthropogenic emissions from Maine and New Hampshire (as well as the other New England states) are significant contributors to elevating ozone concentrations in Maine.

 

The Cape Elizabeth and Kittery sites appear to be slightly more VOC-limited (meaning that an increase in hydrocarbons yields elevated ozone smog readings), whereas the ozone production at the downwind site of Cadillac Mountain is more dependent on the existence of nitrogen oxides. This is consistent with many previous findings that indicate as urban plumes move downwind, the accumulated source of hydrocarbons eventually exceeds the supply of NOx and the chemistry shifts from VOC to NOx-limited.

 

The quantity of biogenic VOC's, especially the most prevalent reactive species of isoprene, was found to comprise half (or less than half) of the "reactive compounds" during both of the episodes analyzed. This means that even though biogenic VOC's played a role in the production of ozone during these time periods, it was in no means the prominent generator of ozone. A comparison of the air samples taken in Boston, laden with the signature of fresh automobile exhaust, and those found at the Cape Elizabeth and Kittery sites are remarkably alike and exhibit similar benzene to toluene ratios. Historically, the greatest number of ozone exceedances occur during holiday weekends in the summer when transportation and utility demands are greatest throughout the state, and anthropogenic emissions are at their annual peaks.

 

If Maine wanted to reduce the compounds that created the most ozone during the days of federal exceeedances, the following compounds should be targeted: isoprene, toluene, ethane, ethylene, propylene, isopentane, m&p-xylene and 1,2,3- trimethylbenzene, benzene, 2-Methylpentane and n-Butane. These compounds all were found in exhaust from automobiles or diesels with the exception of: 1,2,3- trimethylbenzene (Sagebiel 1996). Isoprene is produced mostly by trees, but, it does make up a small part of exhaust of autos and diesels ( Sagebiel 1996).

 

Clearly the influence of short-range transport of ozone and its precursors introduced into the atmosphere close to and within Maine during these three days in 1997 caused a significant degradation of air quality within Maine. It is obvious that long-range pollution transported into Maine negatively influences the air quality within Maine, but obviously to a much lesser degree.

 

The key question for Maine policy-makers is: "What emission reduction strategy should Maine use to reduce Maine's ozone problem?". The analysis of monitored data from these three days, during the summer of 1997 when ozone smog levels exceeded the federal standard, demonstrates that improvements in Maine's air quality would be gained if there were substantially less human-made VOC's and NOx generated within the State of Maine.

 

 

Table of Contents Image Directory:

Figure 1. Comparison of Ozone Values Across Maine 6/21/97-6/22/97

Figure 2. Ozone Conc. on 6/21/97 mapped with the Ozone Mapping System

Figure 3. Surface Plot for 00Z 22 Jun 1997

Figure 4. 500 mb winds for 0000Z Jun 22 1997

Figure 5. 850 mb temperatures for 0000Z Jun 22 1997

Figure 6. GOES East IR Satellite for 0015Z Jun 22 1997

Figure 7. KFS 24 Hour Back Trajectory for 00UTC 22 Jun 1997

Figure 8. CETL 24 Hour Back Trajectory for 00UTC 22 Jun 1997

Figure 9. BHCM 24 Hour Back Trajectory for 00UTC 22 Jun 1997

Figure 10. NOx Limited or VOC Limited on 6/21/97 and 6/22/97

Figure 11. Comparison of TNMOC Values on 6/21/97 and 6/22/97

Figure 12. Comparison of Benzene Values on 6/21/97 and 6/22/97

Figure 13. Comparison of Toluene Values on 6/21/97 and 6/22/97

Figure 14. Comparison of m/p Xylene Values on 6/21/97 and 6/22/97

Figure 15. Comparison of Ethylene Values on 6/21/97 and 6/22/97

Figure 16. Comparison of Benzene and Toluene Ratios on 6/21/97 and 6/22/97

Figure 17. Comparison of 1997 Maine data and EPA Round Robin Canisters

Figure 18. MIR for KFS on 6/21/97 and 6/22/97

Figure 19. MIR for CETL on 6/21/97 and 6/22/97

Figure 20. MIR for BHCM on 6/21/97 and 6/22/97

Figure 21. Scotia Prince Yarmouth to Portland 6/21/97

Figure 22. Scotia Prince Portland to Yarmouth 6/21/97 to 6/22/97

Figure 23. Surface Plot for 00Z 23 Jun 1997

Figure 24. GOES East IR Satellite for 0015Z Jun 1997

Figure 25. 500 mb winds for 0000Z Jun 23 1997

Figure 26. 850 mb temperatures for 0000Z Jun 23 1997

Figure 27. Ozone Conc. on 6/22/97 mapped with the Ozone Mapping System

Figure 28. KFS 24 Hour Back Trajectory for 00UTC 23 Jun 1997

Figure 29. CETL 24 Hour Back Trajectory for 00UTC 23 Jun 1997

Figure 30. BHCM 24 Hour Back Trajectory for 00UTC 23 Jun 1997

Figure 31. Ozone Conc. on 6/29/97 mapped with the Ozone Mapping System

Figure 32. Ozone Conc. on 6/30/97 mapped with the Ozone Mapping System

Figure 33. Ozone Conc. on 7/01/97 mapped with the Ozone Mapping System

Figure 34. Comparison of Ozone Values Across Maine 6/29/97-7/01/97

Figure 35. 500 mb winds for 0000Z Jul 01 1997

Figure 36. Surface Plot for 00Z 01 Jul 1997

Figure 37. 850 mb temperatures for 0000Z Jul 01 1997

Figure 38. GOES East IR Satellite for 0015Z Jul 01 1997

Figure 39. GOES East IR Satellite for 0015Z Jun 02 1997

Figure 40. KFS 24 Hour Back Trajectory for 00UTC 01 Jul 1997

Figure 41. CETL 24 Hour Back Trajectory for 00UTC 01 Jul 1997

Figure 42. BHCM 24 Hour Back Trajectory for 00UTC 01 Jul 1997

Figure 43. KFS 24 Hour Back Trajectory for 00UTC 02 Jul 1997

Figure 44. CETL 24 Hour Back Trajectory for 00UTC 02 Jul 1997

Figure 45. BHCM 24 Hour Back Trajectory for 00UTC 02 Jul 1997

Figure 46. NOx Limited or VOC Limited on 6/28/97 through 7/01/97

Figure 47. NOx Limited or VOC Limited on 6/30/97 through 7/01/97

Figure 48. Comparison of Benzene and Toluene Ratios 6/28/97 to 7/01/97

Figure 49. Comparison of m/p Xylene/Benzene Ratios 6/29/97 to 7/01/97

Figure 50. Comparison of NOy and NOx Values 6/28/97 to 7/01/97

Figure 51. Comparison of Benzene Values 6/28/97 to 7/01/97

Figure 52. Comparison of Toluene Values 6/28/97 to 7/01/97

Figure 53. Comparison of Ethylene Values 6/28/97 to 7/01/97

Figure 54. Comparison of m/p Xylene Values 6/28/97 to 7/01/97

Figure 55. Comparison of Isoprene Values 6/28/97 to 7/01/97

Figure 56. MIR for KFS on 6/30/97 and 7/01/97

Figure 57. MIR for CETL on 6/30/97 and 7/01/97

Figure 58. MIR for BHCM on 6/30/97 and 7/01/97

Figure 59. Scotia Prince Yarmouth to Portland 6/30/97

Figure 60. Scotia Prince Portland to Yarmouth 6/30/97 to 7/01/97

Figure 61. Scotia Prince Yarmouth to Portland 7/01/97

Figure 62. Scotia Prince Portland to Yarmouth 7/01/97 to 7/02/97

Appendix: 1997 Ozone Exceedance Days Summary for Maine

 

Acknowledgements:

 

The author of this paper would like to recognize the efforts of the following people contributing to this paper:

 

The staff of the Field Services Division of the State of Maine Bureau of Air Quality, Alan VanArsdale of US EPA Region I Lexington Laboratory, Lexington. Mass., Paul Sanborn and Jim Archer of the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services, Rich Poirot of the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation, NARSTO (the North American Research Study on Tropospheric Ozone), and the NARSTO forecasting team.

 

References:

Sagabiel et al. Real-World Emissions and calculated Reactivities of Organic Species From Motor Vehicles. Atmospheric Environment Vol 30, No. 12 pp 2287-2296.

 

F.C. Fehsenfeld et al. 1993. North Atlantic Regional Experiment summer intensive: Forward (Paper 96JD03629)

 

Ray and Michaelsen et al. 1995. North Atlantic Regional Experiment. Surface level measurements of ozone and precursor at coastal and offshore locations in the Gulf of Maine (Paper 96JD02010)

 

Poirot, R.L., and C. Michaelsen. 1996. Toward a more efficient transboundary exchange of air quality data. Paper presented at Air Quality Conference - Clean Air in the Northeast held on April 30-May 1, 1996 in St. John, New Brunswick.

 

NESCAUM (Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management). 1993. 1992 regional ozone concentrations in the northeastern United States. R. Poirot, ed. Boston, MA.

 

NESCAUM 1994. Preview of 1994 Ozone Precursor Concentrations in the Northeastern U.S. August, 1995.

 

NESCAUM 1997. Miller, Amar and Tatsutani. The Long-Range Transport of Ozone and Its Precursors in the Eastern United States. February, 1997

 

OTAG (Ozone Transport Assessment Group). Executive Report 1997. This document is OTAG's final report to USEPA summarizing the impacts of transported ozone.

 

Henry, R.C., C.W. Lewis, J.F. Collins. 1994. Vehicle-related hydrocarbon source compositions from ambient data: the GRACE/SAFER method. Environ. Sci. Technol. 28:823-832.

 

Sillman, Sanford. April, 1997. Review Article: The Relation between Ozone, NOx and Hydrocarbons in Urban and Polluted Rural Environments. Submitted to J. Geophys. Res. (Special session, Middle Tennessee Ozone Study)

 

Main, Roberts, and Korc of Sonoma Technology. October 1996. PAMS Data Analysis Workshop: Illustrating the Use of PAMS Data to Support Ozone Control Programs. Presented at EPA Region I Headquarters Boston, MA.

 

Roberts, J.M. 1990. Review Article: The Atmospheric Chemistry of Organic Nitrates. Atmospheric Environment Vol. 24A, No. 2, pp. 243-287.

 

Summers, P.W. 1997. Long-Range Transport of Ground-Level Ozone and Its Precursors: Assessment of Methods to Qualtify Transboundary Transport Within the Northeastern United States and Eastern Canada. Commission for Environmental Cooperation / A Report prepared by the Secretariat of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation

 

 

Appendix:

 

1997 OZONE EXCEEDANCE DAYS SUMMARY FOR MAINE

(based on data available as of September 29, 1997)

 

 

 

 

NO. OF STATE

NO. OF HOURS

NO. OF FEDERAL

NO. OF HOURS

MONTH

EXCEEDANCE DAYS

> 0.081 PPM

EXCEEDANCE DAYS

> 0.124 PPM

 

 

 

 

 

April

0

0

0

0

May

0

0

0

0

June

8

212

2

11

July

8

180

1

5

August

4

95

0

0

September

0

0

0

0

TOTAL

20

487

3

16

 

 

 

 

 

1997 OZONE EXCEEDANCE DAYS SUMMARY BY SITE

(based on data available as of September 29, 1997)

 

 

 

1997 OZONE

NO. OF STATE

NO. OF HOURS

NO. OF FEDERAL

NO. OF HOURS

SITE LOCATIONS

EXCEEDANCE DAYS

> 0.081 PPM

EXCEEDANCE DAYS

> 0.124 PPM

 

 

 

 

 

Ashland 1

1

2

0

0

Bar Harbor, Cadillac Mt.

13

71

1

1

Bar Harbor, McFarl. Hill

7

18

0

0

Cape Elizabeth

16

77

2

5

Gardiner

8

29

0

0

Holden

3

5

0

0

Hollis

7

22

1

1

Howland

1

5

0

0

Kennebunkport

13

68

2

3

Kittery

13

69

1

1

Lovell

0

0

0

0

Phippsburg

11

63

2

4

Port Clyde

10

58

1

1

R. Campobello Int. Park

0

0

0

0

Scotia Prince*

17*

93*

0*

0*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1. CASTNet sites operated by EPA, difficult to poll with our equipment. May be revised slightly upward in final

report.

* For informational purposes only; not included in state or federal days/hours summaries

 

1997 STATE OZONE EXCEEDANCE DAYS SUMMARY BY DATE

(based on data available as of September 29, 1997)

 

 

DATE

SITE

MAX. CONC.

TIME

HRS. > 0.081

HRS. > 0.124

 

 

 

 

 

 

97.06.11

Cape Elizabeth

0.085

1500

2

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

97.06.12

Kennebunkport

0.097

1800

3

0

 

Kittery

0.095

1800

6

0

 

Bar Harbor CM

0.094

0900

4

0

 

Cape Elizabeth

0.090

1700

2

0

 

Scotia Prince*

0.085*

2000*

3*

0*

 

Phippsburg

0.084

1900

3

0

 

 

 

 

18

0

 

97.06.13

Bar Harbor CM

0.090

1600

6

0

 

Phippsburg

0.086

1200

2

0

 

Gardiner

0.084

1600

1

0

 

 

 

 

9

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

97.06.21

Bar Harbor CM

0.126

1700

7

1

 

Kennebunkport

0.125

1500

10

1

 

Cape Elizabeth

0.121

1500

9

0

 

Phippsburg

0.115

1500

8

0

 

Kittery

0.114

1400

10

0

 

Scotia Prince*

0.108*

1600*

8*

0*

 

Port Clyde

0.104

1800

7

0

 

Bar Harbor MH

0.098

1700

3

0

 

Gardiner

0.094

1600

3

0

 

Hollis

0.086

2400

1

0

 

 

 

 

58

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

97.06.22

Phippsburg

0.103

1400

7

0

 

Cape Elizabeth

0.095

1300

4

0

 

Port Clyde

0.094

1400

6

0

 

Kennebunkport

0.093

1200

2

0

 

Bar Harbor CM

0.09

1400

8

0

 

Scotia Prince*

0.087*

1500*

6*

0*

 

Hollis

0.086

0100

1

0

 

 

 

 

28

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

97.06.25

Kennebunkport

0.089

2000

4

0

 

Hollis

0.087

1700

1

0

 

Kittery

0.085

2300

3

0

 

Cape Elizabeth

0.084

2000

2

0

 

Scotia Prince*

0.084*

2200*

1*

0*

 

 

 

 

10

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

97.06.26*

Scotia Prince*

0.084*

0300*

2*

0*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

* For informational purposes only; not included in state or federal days/hours summaries

1997 STATE OZONE EXCEEDANCE DAYS SUMMARY BY DATE

(based on data available as of September 29, 1997)

 

 

DATE

SITE

MAX. CONC.

TIME

HRS. > 0.081

HRS. > 0.124

 

 

 

 

 

 

97.06.29

Kennebunkport

0.121

1800

8

0

 

Kittery

0.112

1700

6

0

 

Cape Elizabeth

0.106

1900

8

0

 

Phippsburg

0.100

2200

6

0

 

Scotia Prince*

0.100*

2200*

7*

0*

 

Port Clyde

0.085

2100

2

0

 

Bar Harbor CM

0.082

2100

1

0

 

 

 

 

31

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

97.06.30

Cape Elizabeth

0.154

1900

13

2

 

Kennebunkport

0.154

1800

11

2

 

Phippsburg

0.143

2100

10

3

 

Scotia Prince*

0.138*

2200*

15*

2*

 

Port Clyde

0.134

2200

6

1

 

Kittery

0.132

1800

8

1

 

Bar Harbor CM

0.088

2100

7

0

 

Bar Harbor MH

0.084

2000

1

0

 

 

 

 

56

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

97.07.01

Cape Elizabeth

0.130

1500

11

3

 

Phippsburg

0.125

1600

10

1

 

Hollis

0.125

1700

7

1

 

Kittery

0.121

1500

10

0

 

Port Clyde

0.119

1700

15

0

 

Kennebunkport

0.119

1400

9

0

 

Gardiner

0.117

2000

7

0

 

Bar Harbor MH

0.117

2200

4

0

 

Scotia Prince*

0.117*

1600*

14*

0*

 

Bar Harbor CM

0.114

2200

14

0

 

Holden

0.098

2400

3

0

 

 

 

 

90

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

97.07.02

Holden

0.092

0100

1

0

 

Ashland

0.090

1800

2

0

 

Howland

0.085

1400

5

0

 

Bar Harbor CM

0.083

0100

1

0

 

 

 

 

9

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

* For informational purposes only; not included in state or federal days/hours summaries

1997 STATE OZONE EXCEEDANCE DAYS SUMMARY BY DATE

(based on data available as of September 29, 1997)

 

 

DATE

SITE

MAX. CONC.

TIME

HRS. > 0.081

HRS. > 0.124

 

 

 

 

 

 

97.07.07

Bar Harbor CM

0.106

1800

4

0

 

Kittery

0.106

1500

4

0

 

Kennebunkport

0.098

1500

4

0

 

Bar Harbor MH

0.097

1800

4

0

 

Cape Elizabeth

0.093

1500

3

0

 

Phippsburg

0.090

1500

3

0

 

Gardiner

0.089

1400

3

0

 

Port Clyde

0.084

1700

1

0

 

Scotia Prince*

0.083*

1700*

2*

0*

 

 

 

 

26

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

97.07.09

Kennebunkport

0.083

1300

1

0

 

Kittery

0.083

1200

1

0

 

 

 

 

2

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

97.07.14

Kittery

0.108

2000

4

0

 

Cape Elizabeth

0.092

2300

2

0

 

Kennebunkport

0.090

1900

4

0

 

 

 

 

10

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

97.07.17

Small Point

0.105

1600

6

0

 

Port Clyde

0.102

1600

7

0

 

Cape Elizabeth

0.089

1500

3

0

 

Bar Harbor CM

0.082

1600

1

0

 

Scotia Prince*

0.116*

1700*

5*

0*

 

 

 

 

17

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

97.07.27

Hollis

0.105

1500

2

0

 

Cape Elizabeth

0.103

1400

3

0

 

Kittery

0.100

1300

4

0

 

Bar Harbor CM

0.099

1900

4

0

 

Gardiner

0.098

1800

2

0

 

Kennebunkport

0.097

1300

3

0

 

Port Clyde

0.097

1400

3

0

 

Phippsburg

0.097

1400

1

0

 

Bar Harbor MH

0.086

1900

2

0

 

 

 

 

24

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

97.07.18*

Scotia Prince*

0.093*

0600*

5*

0*

 

 

 

 

 

 

97.07.28

Cape Elizabeth

0.087

1300

2

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

97.08.01*

Scotia Prince*

0.093*

1700*

2*

0*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

* For informational purposes only; not included in state or federal days/hours summaries

1997 STATE OZONE EXCEEDANCE DAYS SUMMARY BY DATE

(based on data available as of September 29, 1997)

 

 

DATE

SITE

MAX. CONC.

TIME

HRS. > 0.081

HRS. > 0.124

 

 

 

 

 

 

97.08.02

Scotia Prince*

0.095*

1700*

6*

0*

 

Cape Elizabeth

0.090

1600

3

0

 

Port Clyde

0.087

1900

4

0

 

 

 

 

7

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

97.08.03*

Scotia Prince*

0.098*

0100*

5*

0*

 

 

 

 

 

 

97.08.10

Cape Elizabeth

0.118

1600

8

0

 

Scotia Prince*

0.115*

1700*

7*

0*

 

Port Clyde

0.113

2000

7

0

 

Kennebunkport

0.111

1800

6

0

 

Phippsburg

0.109

1900

7

0

 

Kittery

0.104

1600

8

0

 

Bar Harbor CM

0.102

2200

4

0

 

Bar Harbor MH

0.093

2200

3

0

 

Gardiner

0.089

2100

5

0

 

Hollis

0.086

2300

6

0

 

 

 

 

54

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

97.08.11

Gardiner

0.102

1600

7

0

 

Kittery

0.101

1600

4

0

 

Hollis

0.097

1600

4

0

 

Bar Harbor CM

0.097

0100

10

0

 

Kennebunkport

0.091

1400

3

0

 

Cape Elizabeth

0.088

1400

2

0

 

Holden

0.085

1700

1

0

 

Bar Harbor MH

0.084

0100

1

0

 

 

 

 

32

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

97.08.16*

Scotia Prince*

0.085*

1700*

1*

0*

 

 

 

 

 

 

97.08.17*

Scotia Prince*

0.098*

0200*

4*

0*

 

 

 

 

 

 

97.08.27

Kittery

0.082

1600

1

0

 

Gardiner

0.082

1700

1

0

 

 

 

 

2

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

97.09.19*

Scotia Prince*

0.084*

1000*

2*

0*

 

 

 

 

 

 

97.09.20*

Scotia Prince*

0.082*

0500*

2*

0*