Below about 2000 m msl, mesoscale and topographic effects can
redirect or channel the flows, resulting in transport directions
and distances different from the synoptically-driven winds above
or the surface winds below. These effects include jets that form
above the surface layer at night, thermal effects, channeling
by river valleys, and the lee trough that forms east of the Appalachians.
Near the coast, land-sea breezes are also important. The flow
in this transport regime was examined for the July 14-15 and July
31-August 1 episodes. The characteristics observed for the episodes
are described below. The general characteristics of the jet flows
and the lee trough are also described in this section.
The nature of the channeled flows can be seen in the time-height
cross sections of the upper-air winds. Figures 5-1 and
5-2 show the winds at the Rutgers
radar profiler site at New Brunswick, NJ for the July 14-15 and
July 31-August 1 episodes. In these figures, the flows above the
surface up to about 800-1000 m decoupled from the surface flow
and accelerated each night. The flows in this region also had
different speeds and/or directions than the flow farther aloft.
During the day, the winds throughout the boundary layer became
coupled and were similar up through 1000-1500 m agl. Also during
the day, frictional effects slowed the winds aloft below the nighttime
speeds. On most nights in these figures, the jet can be seen in
a layer just above the surface, where the speeds are higher than
those above or below. On the night of July 15, at the end of the
episode, the winds aloft did not form a jet (i.e., they were not
faster than the winds both above and below). They were, however,
faster than the winds below. This is a normal occurrence on most
summer nights. When the frictional effects are decoupled, the
winds aloft will be faster than the surface winds.
On the nights before the regional exceedance days of July 14,
15, and August 1, the nighttime winds in the lower boundary layer
were generally from the southwest in the early night hours and
rotated to westerly or even northwesterly later at night. On the
nights before July 16 and July 31, which were not widespread exceedance
days, the flow directions became easterly or northeasterly in
this layer.
The acceleration of the flow in the lower boundary layer aloft
at night and the variation of flow with altitude were common features
throughout the region. Figures 5-3 to 5-10 (Figure 5-3,
5-4, 5-5,
5-6, 5-7,
5-8, 5-9,
5-10) show the upper-air winds
at 0300 and 1500 EST on July 14-15 and July 31-August 1. These
feature can be seen throughout the region on each of the days
except the early morning of July 31 when the winds aloft were
essentially calm over much of the region.
The potential for transport overnight in the lower boundary layer
is reflected in back trajectories at 500 m agl ending at 0500
EST on the episode days. These trajectories are shown in Figures 5-11,
5-12, and 5-13.
The trajectories show transport of roughly 200-400 km (125-250
miles) in 12 hours overnight.
The occurrence and characteristics of low-level jets in the Northeast
during the summer of 1995 have been examined by Ray et al. (1997).
Their results are excerpted below.
Low-level jets form at night and consist of aloft layers of air
that have higher wind speeds than air located above and below
the jet. Such jets have been observed and studied extensively
in the central United States (Parrish et al., 1988), but are not
as well understood in the northeastern United States. As discussed
by Blackadar (1957), during daytime, winds within the mixed layer
that respond to a geostrophic pressure gradient become sub-geostrophic
due to the frictional effects of the ground. At night, a low-level
jet can form when the stable conditions in the nocturnal boundary
layer decouple aloft winds from surface frictional effects, causing
the aloft winds to accelerate in response to the geostrophic pressure
gradient. Under certain conditions an inertial oscillation develops,
causing the winds to overshoot and become super-geostrophic, generating
a jet in a shallow layer residing above the nocturnal boundary
layer. While aloft wind speeds usually increase after sunset with
the decoupling of surface frictional forces, the atmospheric conditions
are not always such that a low-level jet is formed. Aloft wind
maxima can also be caused by approaching fronts, convergence,
sloping terrain, lake effects, etc.
A typical example of the evolution of the low-level jet is illustrated
in Figure 3-1 shown earlier. That
figure shows the temporal evolution of the low-level jet at Rutgers
University, NJ on the night of July 31-August 1, 1995. At 1800
EST, winds below 900 m agl were about 3 m/s, which was similar
to the winds measured earlier in the afternoon and comparable
to the surface winds. By 1900 EST, the nocturnal boundary layer
had formed, which decoupled the surface and aloft air causing
the aloft winds to accelerate. The aloft winds increased in speed
throughout the night and by 0200 EST, they reached about 15 m/s.
Below the jet, the surface winds at night were less than 2 m/s.
During the summer of 1995, these low-level jets were most likely
to develop when the entire OTR was under the influence of a large
surface high-pressure system with weak pressure gradients, centered
to the south or just offshore of the OTR. These were also the
conditions favorable for the production of high ozone concentrations.
Low-level jets occurred on six out of nine nights preceding a
regional ozone episode day in 1995. Also, low-level jets were
two to three times more likely to be observed on nights preceding
ozone episode days than on other nights. In addition, they were
more frequently observed at sites located on the coastal plain
east of the Appalachians (Gettysburg, PA; Rutgers University,
NJ; and Millstone Point, CT) than at the site located west of
the Appalachians (Holbrook, PA) or at the site located in the
Hudson River Valley (Redhook, NY).
Aloft winds throughout the NARSTO-Northeast study area were examined for the nights of the July 12-15 and July 31-August 2, 1995 ozone episodes to determine the characteristics of these low-level jets. These characteristics are summarized below.
The Appalachian lee trough is a region of lower pressure that
forms to the east of the Appalachian Mountains (Pagnotti, 1987;
Gaza, 1996). Gaza (1996) examined the occurrence of the trough
during the NARSTO-Northeast study period. Westerly to northwesterly
synoptic winds flowing perpendicular to the mountains produce
the trough with an axis parallel to the mountains that extends
from eastern Maine southwestward into New Jersey and eastern Pennsylvania.
The trough is characterized by southwesterly winds in advance
of (east of) the trough axis and westerly to northwesterly winds
behind (west of) the trough. Such troughs have been observed on
40 percent of the days from May through September (Weisman, 1990).
However, Pagnotti (1987) reported that the lee trough was observed
on 70 percent of the cases when ozone exceeded 200 ppb in New
York, New Jersey, or Connecticut from 1978-1983. This is not surprising
given the predominance of westerly to northwesterly synoptic flow
during ozone episodes.
Gaza (1996) reports that the afternoon position of the trough
can affect the location of the zone of maximum ozone. The location
of the trough is dependent on the speed of the synoptic winds.
The trough moves farther east (near the coast) with stronger winds
and closer to mountains with weaker winds. The trough tends to
stay at inland locations if the winds at 850 mb (about 1500 m
msl) are less than about 10 m/s (Taylor, 1997). This is the case
on most exceedance days in the New York City area (Gaza, 1996).
The importance of the trough is not well understood, but the southwesterly
flow ahead of the trough might help align the flow with the urban
corridor emissions and contribute to day-to-day carryover along
the corridor as well as affect the direction of the surface flows
in the afternoon. The southwesterly flow ahead of the trough may
also reinforce similar flow in the jet.
| Submit your comments, feedback, questions, and ideas pertaining this page. Your input will be automatically added to the existing annotations. In order to add a new comment, you must be registered with the OTAG/AQA Peoples Page. |