Workbook - Draft

In order to add a new entry to this list, you must be registered with the PM-Fine Peoples Page. See the Interactive Help page for assistance in submitting a new entry and responding to existing comments.

test: test; Submitted by Schmidt Mark on 8/15/00; RecID: Forum.MarkSchmidt; Comment/Feedback URL: test

The Ends vs. the Means or the Chicken vs. the Egg?: comments on: "On PMFine Management, PMFine Analysis Workbook Design and Implementation"). I agree with Rudy's ideas on PMFine (or any pollutant) management process - and generally seem to agree with almost everyone's general ideas (including mine) on useful workbook contents etc........; Submitted by Poirot Rich on 7/28/98; RecID: Forum.RichPoirot1; Comment/Feedback URL: /PMFine/Workbook/EndsVsMeans/EndsVsMeansCommentFeedback1.html

Suggested Revision to Workbook Organization & Process: Here are some ideas for possible reorganization of the Workbook. If no one likes them there's no problem. But if a few agree, or have other; Submitted by Poirot Rich on 7/23/98; RecID: Forum.RichPoirot; Comment/Feedback URL: /PMFine/WorkBook/OutLineRev/workfixCommentFeedback1.html

Workbook structure, implementation: These notes are prepared as input to the PMFine Analysis Workbook design discussion to be continued on July 30, 1998. It states my beliefs, a suggested outline for the Workbook and comments on the Workbook implementation approach.; Submitted by Husar Rudolf on 7/27/98; RecID: Forum.RudolfHusar; Comment/Feedback URL: /CAPITA/CapitaReports/PMFineAn/PMFineAssessCommentFeedback1.html

Comments on poirot's comments

Rich is on target with his comments. Hopefully within the next two years we will be able to learn from/incorporate data analysis/evaluation/assessment results from small scale and large scale field studies, such as the Upper Ohio River study, the SEARCH, and a NARSTO-NE Aerosol study (1999/2000) into the data analysis vortex. I do differ with rich about the focus on data analysis, however. I prefer to think of "this" effort as data assessment..which illicits more of an evaluation context...nit picking again! We have an opportunity to mold a different kind of assessment/thought process. One that has a more univeral flavor of determining the meaning of air pollution data. Transport needs to be universally understood as the linch pin of future assessment efforts...a two way street - how much of air pollutant X comes from an upwind airshed, and how much of air pollutant X leaves my (the) area of concern and influences downwind areas. This is a "us-vs-them" issue. Whenever "we" ask questions on sources and effects "we" need to think INPUT/OUTPUT. This is a "take responsibility for transboundary pollution" issue. If the areas/kinds of assessment are laid out well then the transport wars/issues of OTAG should be reduced.

Finally, I would like to see the ozone and PMf data assessment folks merged.

ava

Submitted by vanarsdale alan on 7/24/98

RecID: Forum.alanvanarsdale

Comment/Feedback URL: /PMFine/RemoteCFPages/CommentFeedback12.html

Fine Particulate (PM2.5) Data Analysis Workbook, DRAFT 4/28/98: This is a draft outline of the fine PM data analysis workbook prepared by Miki Wayland and Shelly Eberly; Submitted by Eberly Shelly on 7/14/98; RecID: Forum.ShellyEberly; Comment/Feedback URL: /PMFine/Reports/PMAnalWKB_Outline/PManalWKB_OutlineCommentFeedback2.html